* On 30.10.2011 08:25 PM, Mihai Moldovan wrote: > As the first paste in http://trac.macports.org/ticket/27237#comment:14 > suggests (extracted from new_allocator.h:98), __p should be permitted to > be a null pointer.. which... well, is clearly not the case here for some > reason. Sorry, bad typo correction: __p should *NOT* *ever* be permitted to be a null pointer for obvious reasons.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
