Andrew Haley <aph <at> redhat.com> writes: > > On 10/13/2011 12:23 PM, MikeW wrote: ... > > I don't think so. If every there was a case for "use asm", it's surely > this. > > Andrew. > > PS Thanks, Andrew.
Andrew Haley <aph <at> redhat.com> writes: > > On 10/13/2011 12:23 PM, MikeW wrote: ... > > I don't think so. If every there was a case for "use asm", it's surely > this. > > Andrew. > > PS Thanks, Andrew.