Re: mno-eabi option on powerpc-elf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Rohit Arul Raj <rohitarulraj@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Rohit Arul Raj <rohitarulraj@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> I am working with powerpc-elf tool chain v4.5.2 (with newlib).
>>>
>>> I need some clarification regarding the -mno-eabi option. From the GCC
>>> docs, this option means that the tool chain does not adhere to EABI.
>>>
>>> -mno-eabi:
>>>          On System V.4 and embedded PowerPC systems do not adhere to
>>> the Embedded Applications Binary Interface (eabi) which is a set of
>>> modifications to the System V.4 specifications.
>>>
>>> Does that mean if i use '-mno-eabi', it will adhere to System V.4
>>> specs completely like the 'powerpc-linux' tool chain?
>>
>> This question would be more appropriate for the mailing list
>> gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx.  Please take any followups to gcc-help.  Thanks.
>>
>> Yes, using -mno-eabi should give you an ABI identical to standard System
>> V.4.
>>
>> Ian
>>
>
> Thanks Ian.
>
> Also it has been mentioned in the gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c that "A
> happy side-effect is that  '-mno-eabi' libraries can be used with
> '-meabi' programs". i also see the 'newlib' built with '-mno-eabi'
> option.
>
> Is using 'mno-eabi' libs with 'meabi' program conforms to ABI standard?
>
> Thanks,
> Rohit
>

Got the following links which says they are compatible.
http://www.rtems.com/ml/rtems-users/2002/may/msg00136.html
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.newlib/1681

Please let me know otherwise.

Thanks,
Rohit



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux