Re: CDImode in reg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Aurelien Buhrig <aurelien.buhrig.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: CDImode in reg
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 17:50:09 +0200
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>, gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAJ-J9_WRCzXe7uTS13+FB=OOg7VCr_qA5CqPjYWqQkvpgT2JRg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJ-J9_VRBj7yY4j8-yWnzYjgoOYRLP-rxKLbDS7BwWVyyCvxoA@mail.gmail.com> <mcrobxwq28w.fsf@coign.corp.google.com> <CAJ-J9_WRCzXe7uTS13+FB=OOg7VCr_qA5CqPjYWqQkvpgT2JRg@mail.gmail.com>

So it should be skipped and the ICE is the normal behavior for such
irrelevant test cases ?


It should be skipped, but no input should ICE the compiler.


Segher

References:
- CDImode in reg
  - From: Aurelien Buhrig
- Re: CDImode in reg
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: CDImode in reg
  - From: Aurelien Buhrig

Prev by Date: Re: CDImode in reg
Next by Date: Re: CDImode in reg
Previous by thread: Re: CDImode in reg
Next by thread: Re: CDImode in reg
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux