Re: Fastest minimum-width integer types and limits macros

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gunther Nikl <gnikl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Is there a special requirement about the value of the limits
> macros for fastest minimum-width integers? Eg. would it be legal
> to use the limits of a a "signed char" if int_fast8_t is defined
> in terms of an int? Or is it required to use the proper limit of
> int?

I don't understand what you mean.  Can you show us some example code
that you are uncertain about?

Ian


[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux