Re: Question on Taming the Optimizer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: noloader@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Question on Taming the Optimizer
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:36:57 +0100
Cc: GCC Users List <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAH8yC8=Mtm08uVKuUutsCgV57AWG3A+-FJib1YBAgF+zD6fKMQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH8yC8kV6L_GOQNY9Ypo-63XC_cM4gPhAt_nA_L6aiYXm1x=_w@mail.gmail.com> <CAH6eHdSJderx9cju7uukYCOOrN02yMTgyA=DSA1mfzBc1G=oVA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH8yC8=Mtm08uVKuUutsCgV57AWG3A+-FJib1YBAgF+zD6fKMQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 28 September 2011 01:40, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> I was thinking __attribute__((optimize(0))) for the two functions in
> question. Is it available in modern GCC versions (ie, 4.0 and above)?

No, it's much more recent than that:
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/changes.html

References:
- Question on Taming the Optimizer
  - From: Jeffrey Walton
- Re: Question on Taming the Optimizer
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: Question on Taming the Optimizer
  - From: Jeffrey Walton

Prev by Date: how to detect that the vector extension is available
Next by Date: Re: Question on Taming the Optimizer
Previous by thread: Re: Question on Taming the Optimizer
Next by thread: Re: Question on Taming the Optimizer
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux