On 7 September 2011 16:42, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 7 September 2011 16:25, Bruce Hoglund wrote: >> >> configure:5771: result: 0 >> configure:5785: checking size of int >> configure:5790: gcc -o conftest -g -fkeep-inline-functions conftest.c >&5 >> Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: >> "___builtin___stpncpy_chk", referenced from: >> ___inline_stpncpy_chk in ccL1VweA.o >> ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 >> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status >> configure:5790: $? = 1 >> configure: program exited with status 1 >> configure: failed program was: >> | /* confdefs.h */ >> >> " >> >> Looks like the checker program ( "confdefs.h") did not have an uptodate idea of w the x86_64 architecture should have or not have, but I may be quite wrong. > > You are. It's just telling you that the symbol it's trying to find is > an x86_64 symbol. > > Again, ignore failures except the "cannot compute sizeof (long long)" > one, they do not indicate a problem, that's what's supposed to happen. Apologies, looking properly I see the same linker error in the "checkin size of long long" test. So now we're finally getting somewhere.
