Re: Would it make sense to have sysroot come from an environment variable?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/26/11 14:42, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Bryan Ischo<bryan@xxxxxxxxx>  writes:

On 08/26/11 13:56, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Bryan Ischo<bryan@xxxxxxxxx>   writes:

Thank you for your reply.  So just to be clear, are you saying that I
would configure gcc --with-sysroot=DIR, and then at runtime I can do:

$ mv DIR DIR.moved
$ /some/random/path/to/gcc

And that gcc, which was installed in a place that had nothing to do
with DIR, will somehow know that I moved DIR?  How does it do that?
Yes, that is what I am saying.  The key is that gcc itself is under
DIR--it's in DIR/bin.  It looks at argv[0] to see where it was run from.

Ian
Now I'm really confused.  My example doesn't have gcc under DIR; it's
under /some/random/path/to/gcc.  sysroot is for header files and
libraries, or at least that's how it's described in all documentation
I have read.  Here is what the gcc manual says about --sysroot:
I'm sorry, you're quite right.  I was confusing two different ideas.

--sysroot points to an existing directory which holds header files and
libraries.

--prefix is what I was thinking of.  gcc is installed in ${prefix}/bin,
and the ${prefix} directory can be moved around at will.

You can use the --sysroot option with gcc to specify the sysroot at
runtime.  There is no environment variable for that, though.

Sorry for the confusion.

Ian

No problem, thanks for the clarification. I think my original question then still stands, which is, rather than having to pass --sysroot to every toolchain command (binutils needs this too, right?), would a single SYSROOT environment variable make more sense?

Thank you,
Bryan



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux