El día 5 de junio de 2011 16:17, Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx> escribió: > On Sun, 5 Jun 2011, José Luis García Pallero wrote: > >> Hello, >> Three months ago I sent this mail to gcc-help: >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2011-03/msg00064.html >> >> The behavior in gcc 4.6 release persists. I don't know if it is a bug >> exactly (in the original mail, some says that is a bug and some no). > > There is no shame in filing a bug report without being absolutely certain. > > In this case you could file one for gcc asking to improve the warning > (casting the constant 0 won't change its sign...), and one against glibc > asking that they explicitly cast 0 to size_t, after looking a bit if you can > find anything similar already reported. I am not saying either change will > happen, but it seems like a resonable strategy. And you may get interesting > comments on the bug reports. But the warning is about the strspn() function instead of return 0; sentence -- ***************************************** José Luis García Pallero jgpallero@xxxxxxxxx (o< / / \ V_/_ Use Debian GNU/Linux and enjoy! *****************************************
