"Bill Cunningham" <billcun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Is there a way to build a compiler without the binaries when run > not having to link with the dynamic linker? I wish to compile a new > glibc and don't want the compiler I build it with to be dependant on > it. Would the -static linker switch be what I'm looking for? Yes: if you link with -static, then the dynamic linker will not be required at runtime. While glibc frowns on static linking, it should work for a program like gcc. Ian
