On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > "Klaus Rudolph" <lts-rudolph@xxxxxx> writes: > >> Axel Freyn wrote: >>> Did you install the development packages? that is, the ubuntu-package >>> libc6-dev? >>> If not, the compiler is right :) >>> If yes -- could you post where on your Ñystem libc.so and libm.so really >>> exist? >>> >> >> the packages are installed and running the gcc/g++ compiler which comes with ubuntu runs fine. >> >> The libs could be found: >> >> krud@mauersegler:~$ ls -lsa /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so >> 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 283 2011-04-11 13:03 /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so >> krud@mauersegler:~$ ls -lsa /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 >> 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2011-05-17 14:27 /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.13.so >> krud@mauersegler:~/test/c++/compile_ubuntu_11.04$ ls -lsa /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc-2.13.so >> 1404 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1434180 2011-04-11 13:08 /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc-2.13.s >> >> The xgcc is not looking inside Â/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu ... >> >> Is there a trick to setup the compiler build (configure??, environment flags) with some additional lib path infos to give xgcc a chance to find the libs? > > > This is interesting and somewhat annoying. ÂI hope the Ubuntu developers > who chose to move these packages will be willing to share patches with > gcc so that gcc works by default. It gets better - try and find a console under Unity.... Jeff
