Re: a question about one part of gcc manual

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: David Kirkby <david.kirkby@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: a question about one part of gcc manual
From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:52:10 -0700
Cc: ali hagigat <hagigatali@xxxxxxxxx>, gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <BANLkTimSnGXEkLVn6EtOgk8gNLHTpn63cA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (David Kirkby's message of "Sun, 24 Apr 2011 16:06:18 +0100")
References: <BANLkTi=JruLLh6f=sdQpyTJr=Hp3YNPbHQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BANLkTimSnGXEkLVn6EtOgk8gNLHTpn63cA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)

David Kirkby <david.kirkby@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I note that the Clang compiler has rejected the fixincludes approach
> used by gcc.

What do they do instead?

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: a question about one part of gcc manual
  - From: ali hagigat

References:
- a question about one part of gcc manual
  - From: ali hagigat
- Re: a question about one part of gcc manual
  - From: David Kirkby

Prev by Date: Re: crti.o: No such file: No such file or directory when compiling gcc 4.5.2
Next by Date: Re: -Bprefix
Previous by thread: Re: a question about one part of gcc manual
Next by thread: Re: a question about one part of gcc manual
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux