kevin diggs <diggskevin38@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> kevin diggs <diggskevin38@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> Based on this: >>> >>> #12 0x0813c8b9 in expand_expr_real_1 (exp=0xb73c76ac, target=0x0, >>> Â Â tmode=VOIDmode, modifier=EXPAND_NORMAL, alt_rtl=0x0) >>> Â Â at ../../gcc-4.3.5/gcc/expr.c:9158 >>> 9158 Â Â Â Â Âexpand_assignment (lhs, rhs, MOVE_NONTEMPORAL (exp)); >>> (gdb) call debug_rtx(lhs) >>> (const/j (nil)) >>> (gdb) call debug_rtx(rhs) >>> (lshiftrt (nil) >>> Â Â (nil)) >> >> That certainly looks wrong. ÂThere shouldn't be any "(nil)" there. >> Either the debugger is confused or the compiler is confused. >> >> >> Ian >> > > Sorry, Ian. Both lhs and rhs are trees. So I am guessing the > debug_rtx() output is meaningless? Well, yes, that is true. Good point. Ian
