Re: -fmem-report

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> kevin diggs <diggskevin38@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Whose string pool is this? The compilers or the program being
>> compiled? In other words, would a string literal in my code show up in
>> this pool?
>
> It is the compiler's string pool.  String literals in your program are
> not stored there.
>
So is there any way to get the code being compiled's string pool?

>> String pool
>> entries               3004
>> identifiers   3004 (100.00%)
>> slots         16384
>> bytes         34k (4803  overhead)
>> table size    64k
>> coll/search   0.0695
>> ins/search    0.1855
>> avg. entry    11.93 bytes (+/- 6.49)
>> longest entry 42
>>
>> The 100.00% in parens confuses me?
>
> That's the percentag of entries in the table that are used relative to
> the number of entries in the table.  The garbage collector can mark
> table entries unused, and thus reduce the number below 100%.  I'm not
> sure how much that actually happens in practice.
>
What threw me was that all of the entries in the compiler's string
pool are used for identifiers? What else can end up in it?

> Ian
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux