Re: gcc peephole problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: vikramsp <vikram2rhyme@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: gcc peephole problem
From: kevin diggs <diggskevin38@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 12:10:24 -0500
Cc: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <31340486.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <31339261.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BANLkTinkDEhBs7z=RvhTMCoxV93K0brOZw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <31340486.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi,

I just checked. The -v option will not show which -f(s) the -Ox
options automatically include. Use:

gcc -O2 -S -fverbose-asm ...

They are included at the top of the asm file with -fverbose-asm.

kevin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc peephole problem
  - From: vikramsp

References:
- gcc peephole problem
  - From: vikramsp
- Re: gcc peephole problem
  - From: kevin diggs
- Re: gcc peephole problem
  - From: vikramsp

Prev by Date: Re: gcc peephole problem
Next by Date: Re: Writing spec rules for preprocessor definitions in 4.6
Previous by thread: Re: gcc peephole problem
Next by thread: Re: gcc peephole problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux