Hello Phil, have a look at those post: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2010-11/msg00019.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2010-10/msg00388.html I got the same problem when I want to add a method to my class. hope it helps Asma ----- Message d'origine ---- De : Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx> À : GCC <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx> Envoyé le : Mar 5 avril 2011, 4h 58min 03s Objet : Re: Classes Whoops i pressed space by accident and it send the mail sorry i didnt get to finish this email, the questions was how would i go about representing: class foobar { int x,y int member_method (int); } So i guess you would follow your nomal record_type stuff but i am not sure what the field_decl should look like for the member_functions. On 5 April 2011 03:55, Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hey all > > I am getting my program model in my front-end devloped to be more > sensible now since all the ground work i've done is now paying off. > > And i just have a few questions about creating classes in GENERIC from > what i've been reading and poking about so far you seem to make a > RECORD_TYPE then add all your VAR_DECLS as FIELD_DECL's as usual but i > am unsure how you add in member functions do you do the same thing but > simply TREE_CHAIN the field decl with the member function name and its > return type or something but i dont think that makes sense. > > Not sure if that made sense well for example i want to represent: > > class foobar { > int x,y; > > > } > > > > i have a record type like: > > tree gpy_object_struct_Type = make_node (RECORD_TYPE); > > name = get_identifier("type"); > field = build_decl(BUILTINS_LOCATION, FIELD_DECL, name, integer_type_node); > DECL_CONTEXT(field) = gpy_object_struct_Type; > DECL_CHAIN(last_field) = field; > last_field = field; > > Then say i wanted to add a member function what should the FIELD_DECL > look like I am up far too late so its probably really obvious but i am > too sleepy to realise. >
