David Paterson <dnpaterson@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Based on various examples of building cross systems around the net, I > have a procedure where the compiler gets built twice, once as a basic > version to allow building of Newlib, and then again as the full cross > compiler version. Looking at the esamples, the first, basic, build > always seems to use --without-headers (and --with-newlib). For the > second build however, some sites have both of these again, while > others have only --with-newlib, so I'm not sure whether I should > include this option in my second stage build or not... > > A search turns up a few references to this option, but none of them > say much beyond something along the lines of "leaving it out will > disable some features". Does anybody have any thoughts on the wisdom > or otherwise of using this option? --without-headers is the default, so it doesn't really matter whether you specify it or not. Ian
