Re: Must unwind in gcc be ported for gcj?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/23/2011 05:19 PM, majia gm wrote:
Hi, everyone.

I'm porting gcj (gcc-4.4.2) to another platform. Right now the gij
fails when interpreting the following program.

File A.java:

import B;
public class A{

	public static void main(String args[])
	{
		try{
			B b=(B)Class.forName("B").newInstance();
		catch(Exception e)
		{
			System.out.println("Cannot find Class B");
		}
	}
}

File B.java:

public class B
{}

I use gdb to track gij, and I found GetCallingClass() in forName()
returns NULL, then the bootstrap loader is used to search the Class B
but with no result. Should the Class B has the same class loader, the
system class loader as the Class A dose?

Then I track the GetCallingClass(), and I found it needs the unwind
function provided by gcc.  Must I port the unwind function?


Short answer: Yes.

libgcj relies internally on exception handling.

You might be able to construct simple programs that don't throw exceptions, but they are kind of a core language feature.

As you saw, the runtime startup code does throw and catch exceptions.

David Daney


[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux