On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, Jakob van Bethlehem wrote:
Dear users,
Since I'm completely new to this list, I'm not sure what type of questions
should be posted here, but hopefully someone can point me in a better
direction, if this is not the right place.
So here's the thing. Consider the following relatively simple piece of code:
class A {
int d_errno;
public:
A(int errno);
virtual ~A() {};
};
A::A(int errno)
:
d_errno(errno)
{}
struct B: public A {
public:
B()
:
A::A(10)
Why are you writing A::A instead of just A?
{}
};
When compiling such code as standard c++, there is no problem. But now I add
the option -std=c++0x (for other pieces of code where I want to experiment a
bit with the new possibilities)
If I then try to compile, I get:
bool.h: In constructor ‘B::B()’:
bool.h:24:9: error: invalid conversion from ‘int’ to ‘int* (*)()’
bool.h:24:9: error: initializing argument 1 of ‘A::A(int* (*)())’
The message could certainly be improved.
--
Marc Glisse
