At 03:59 04.02.2011 -0800, isuru herath wrote: >Hi Brian, > >Again sorry for the late response. I was doing more testing. I followed >your suggestion. But, I think you need to change this to following since >they are pointers. Fabi's suggestion was the same. However results don't >change. Have you ever checked what assembler code is generated? There you should see the accesses, why they're made and possibly how to avoid them. bye Fabi
