Re: Question about Darwin GCC and weak symbol tagging policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: nchaumont <nicolas.chaumont@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Question about Darwin GCC and weak symbol tagging policy
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 20:57:05 +0000
Cc: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <AANLkTimRaPte+pySayba9=AQNAh9b_R0MiMuCcYpLR--@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <30654360.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTimRaPte+pySayba9=AQNAh9b_R0MiMuCcYpLR--@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 12 January 2011 20:15, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> The first non-pure virtual function declared in the class.

... that is not inline at the point of class definition

(forgot that bit)

References:
- Question about Darwin GCC and weak symbol tagging policy
  - From: nchaumont
- Re: Question about Darwin GCC and weak symbol tagging policy
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

Prev by Date: Re: Question about Darwin GCC and weak symbol tagging policy
Next by Date: Re: Exporting new libgomp functions
Previous by thread: Re: Question about Darwin GCC and weak symbol tagging policy
Next by thread: Re: Question about Darwin GCC and weak symbol tagging policy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux