On 08.01.2011 06:23, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Good point, yes, you should add an explicit "memory" clobber. You don't > need to explicitly clobber "cc". That is a fixed register (actually gcc > calls it "flags") and as such gcc won't make any particular assumptions > about it in any case. > > Ian Ok I'm curious as to why. If the information at http://www.ibiblio.org/gferg/ldp/GCC-Inline-Assembly-HOWTO.html#ss5.3 is of any use then I'd have to: [...] If our instruction can alter the condition code register, we have to add "cc" to the list of clobbered registers. If our instruction modifies memory in an unpredictable fashion, add "memory" to the list of clobbered registers. [...] I don't know if any of both situations may happen in my called function, hence I'd have to supply both, or am I wrong? -- Mierswa, Daniel If you still don't like it, that's ok: that's why I'm boss. I simply know better than you do. --- Linus Torvalds, comp.os.linux.advocacy, 1996/07/22
