Re: Linking with nonstandard malloc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Patrick Horgan <phorgan1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> It's the order that they're seen by the linker.  Once the symbols are 
> resolved they aren't looked for anymore, so your malloc.o would resolve 
> malloc() and when glibc is looked at later, the linker would never look 
> for malloc in there since it's already resolved.

What happens to references to malloc() from libc or other
libraries ? Do they also get the own symbol ?


cu
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/

 phone:  +49 36207 519931  email: weigelt@xxxxxxxx
 mobile: +49 151 27565287  icq:   210169427         skype: nekrad666
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme
----------------------------------------------------------------------


[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux