Re: gcc interprets C++0x initialization construct as function declaration‏

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Nathan Ridge <zeratul976@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: gcc interprets C++0x initialization construct as function declarationâ
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 00:37:43 +0000
Cc: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <BLU162-w121954B8D71C62561A140096080@xxxxxxx>
References: <BLU162-w121954B8D71C62561A140096080@xxxxxxx>

2011/1/4 Nathan Ridge:
>
> Is this the desired behaviour?

I *think* it should be valid (obviously only with -std=c++0x) so
please file a bugzilla report to make sure it can be dealt with
appropriately.

References:
- gcc interprets C++0x initialization construct as function declaration‏
  - From: Nathan Ridge

Prev by Date: Re: gcc interprets C++0x initialization construct as function declaration‏
Next by Date: Re: gcc interprets C++0x initialization construct as function declaration‏
Previous by thread: Re: gcc interprets C++0x initialization construct as function declaration‏
Next by thread: Conflict of 'new' keyword when including C header files into C++ modules
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux