Re: int128 error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan,

I have read the manual, but my understanding was that the Intel core2 duo processors supported 128 bit width (from the intel core2 instruction set manual: "...and enabling support for 128 bit integers..."). I assumed that the reason long long was showing up as 64 bits instead of 128 was part of the problem that was causing __int128 to not work (perhaps a compiler flag I had missed or something else).

TS


----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonathan Wakely" <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Touros Spoon" <touros.spoon@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>; <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2011 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: int128 error


On 3 January 2011 08:36, Touros Spoon wrote:
Jeffrey,

thanks for the quick response. I actually tried appending LL to the end of
the value, but the compiler is still complaining, which isnt surprising
because a test shows that long long has a sizeof of 8 bytes, whereas
__int128_t reports 16 bytes.

Read the fabulous manual:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/_005f_005fint128.html

"There is no support in GCC to express an integer constant of type
__int128 for targets having long long integer with less then 128 bit
width."

Since your target's long long is not 128 bits wide, you cannot express
that constant.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux