Greatwolf <gmane.greatwolf@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Still at any rate, in my experience all the other compilers I've tried > (and I've tried quite a few of them), they do output some kind of > information on the file currently compiled. This includes, MSVC > compilers, Borland compilers and even Digital Mars compiler. > > Other times this is handy if for example, I don't want make to output the > commandlines being used in all it's verbosity, I would pass -s to not > echo the command. However, I would still like to see the status of the > files as it compiles. > > I'd imagine this is a rather easy feature to add to gcc, if I were to > implement this and submit a patch for it, would it be accepted? (assuming > coding style and etiquette are followed) How do you feel about the output of the -Q option? Ian
