Re: Unnecessary movzx instruction?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Law <law@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The pass which typically tracks zero/nonzero information and tries to
> eliminate redundant zero/sign extensions is combine which only
> operates on insns found within a single basic block.  In this case the
> instructions at 0x10 and 0x23 are in different basic blocks and
> combine makes a worst case assumption.

Mainline also has the implicit_zee pass  but it doesn't seem to help
with this test case.

Ian


[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux