Thank you very much for your reply. > To the best of my knowledge, current versions are GPL3 and earlier > ones GPL2. Perhaps really early version had other licenses. The > libraries are released under LGPL, so you can use gcc to build closed > source applications. Does this mean that it's possible to use gcc to build closed source applications, regardless of the version of gcc? The reason why I asked about license information is that I want to use gcc to build application whose source I want to keep closed, and I thought that gcc was protected under different kind of license depending on its version. For instance, 3.x is protected under LGPL, and 4.x is protected under GPL, etc. Regards, Yuya Hashimoto ---------------------------------------- > From: iant@xxxxxxxxxx > To: david.kirkby@xxxxxxxxxx; hill_climb@xxxxxxxxxxx > CC: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: license information for gcc > Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:21:06 -0700 > > David Kirkby writes: > > > To the best of my knowledge, current versions are GPL3 and earlier > > ones GPL2. Perhaps really early version had other licenses. The > > libraries are released under LGPL, so you can use gcc to build closed > > source applications. > > All gcc versions between 2.x and 4.2 were under GPLv2. Before 2.x they > were under GPLv1. I'm not sure off-hand of the exact value of x; it may > be 0, that is, 2.0 may have been under GPLv2. > > GPLv2: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html > GPLv1: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-1.0.html > > Ian
