Re: Re : Generic and Gimple in gcc4.6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



charfi asma <charfiasma@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> Yes, this was my question, but Generic will be transformed to Gimple after that, 
> so, why there are no builtin types in Gimple as well ? 
>
> if they ( intrinsic functions and builtin types) are not transfoemed in Gimple, 
> CFG, SSA, ... did we realy need to inculde them in the generic form ?

They aren't included in the GENERIC form any more or less than they are
in the GIMPLE form.  The .tu dump basically dumps the entire symbol
table.

Ian


[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux