Le 8 sept. 2010 à 02:57, Ian Lance Taylor a écrit : > Hi Akim. Hi Ian! Thanks for answering! > Can you clearly define what the impure attribute would mean? In > particular, should it warn about calling the same impure function twice > without an intervening sequence point? Or should it complain about > calling any two impure functions? I'm not really sure which would be > more useful. That's a good question... I would say that the more paranoid, the better, so I would go for #2, though in my case #1 suffices.