Bob Cowdery <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I had read that and I was quite careful to ensure the correct order. I > did a test with just two libraries where the second referenced the first > and as in my follow-up message it didn't pull them in unless I made a > call into each from my main code. It's like the symbol tables are messed > up somehow. If your main program has a call into the first library, and the object required to satisfy that call has a call into the second library, then the linker should certainly pull in the required object from the second library. Can you provide a small standalone example of the problem? Ian
