Re: Adding "soft-fp" support to a new target

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rathish C <Rathish.C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I have one more doubt. Is there any way to obtain the following behavior?
> 	
> 	* By default the libgcc routines should be used.
> 	* If we specify the option say -msoft-fp during compilation, then the
>         soft-fp routines should be used instead of default libgcc routines.
>
> I have done the modifications to support the "-msoft-fp" option. 
> Please suggest how to proceed further.

Change the instruction predicates for your hard floating point
define_insn patterns so that they are not recognized if your option is
used.  E.g., referring back to rs6000, see the use of
TARGET_HARD_FLOAT and TARGET_SOFT_FLOAT in rs6000.md.

Ian

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux