Марк Коренберг wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43998 Please answer to my last question (comment #5) in this bug report. Thanks. I consider this is a bug in gcc inline assembler.
that's funny, I had the exact same problem than yours. I finally ended up using unused variables, like everyone else. I agree with you that it's a bit ugly, but I guess we have to live with that. (The asm syntax is not particularly sexy either.) By the way I suspect the compiler to do some funky optimizations afterwards so apart from ugliness I doubt we lose something. Welcome in reality! :-)
