On 4/28/10 05:16 , charfi asma wrote: > I am not sure that the 2005 paper is out of date because it proposes > gimplification improvments that the recent gcc version (I am using > the gcc 4.4.2) still not take it into account. Perhaps because > efforts are concentrated now in GIMPLE tuples and not in enhancing > old tree structures :) GIMPLE tuples made the statements more compact, but we have still not addressed types and symbols. I'm not sure what you mean by 'produce more compact gimple'. Could you elaborate? Diego.
