Re: PATH_SEPARATOR attempted redefined in gcc-4.6 snapshot on certain targets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pedro, the incomplete bug report appears to be due to your change to
include/filenames.h.  Tim, what configure options are you using to
build?

Pedro, by the way, your ChangeLog entry for the include directory does
not mention that you define PATH_SEPARATOR.  Would you mind fixing
that while you're at it?

Ian

Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx> writes:

> On 4/25/2010 9:41 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> Tim Prince<n8tm@xxxxxxx>  writes:
>>
>>    
>>> Where the system.h header of today's snapshot changes the definition
>>> of PATH_SEPARATOR on certain targets (including cygwin), is it
>>> intended to precede the #define by a #undef?
>>>      
>> What I see in the current gcc/system.h is:
>>
>> #ifndef PATH_SEPARATOR
>> #define PATH_SEPARATOR ':'
>> #endif
>>
>> Can you explain the issue you are seeing in more detail?
>>
>> Ian
>>    
> gcc/system.h  sets PATH_SEPARATOR
> #ifndef PATH_SEPARATOR
> #define PATH_SEPARATOR ':'
> #endif
>
> include/filenames.h changes PATH_SEPARATOR:
> #if defined(__MSDOS__) || defined(_WIN32) || defined(__OS2__) || defined 
> (__CYGW
> IN__)
> #  ifndef HAVE_DOS_BASED_FILE_SYSTEM
> #    define HAVE_DOS_BASED_FILE_SYSTEM 1
> #  endif
> #  undef PATH_SEPARATOR   // added to enable build
> #  define PATH_SEPARATOR ';'
> #  define HAS_DRIVE_SPEC(f) HAS_DOS_DRIVE_SPEC (f)
> #  define IS_DIR_SEPARATOR(c) IS_DOS_DIR_SEPARATOR (c)
> #  define IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH(f) IS_DOS_ABSOLUTE_PATH (f)
> #else /* not DOSish */
>
> -- 
> Tim Prince

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux