burlen <burlen.loring@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> burlen <burlen.loring@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>
>>> When calling a c function from a fortran 90 program with members of a
>>> user defined types for output arguments of the called subroutine the
>>> user defined types aren't being modified as they should be (according
>>> to my understanding).
>>>
>>
>> When you call a C function, you get the C rules. It doesn't matter
>> whether you are calling it from Fortran or not. In C, a modification
>> of an argument is not reflected back to the caller.
>>
>> Ian
>>
> In my understanding, Fortran unless otherwise instructed is supposed
> to pass by address. In the c function modifying the data pointed to
> should do just that, and be visible to the caller. What I don't
> understand is why passing the member of a user defined type behaves as
> if it's passed by value in this case, while passing the corresponding
> native type is passed by address and works as expected.
I think you are going to have to provide an example.
If you write a C function
void foo(int i) { i = 1; }
then the parameter is not going to change in the caller. That's just
how C works. There is no reasonable way to change that.
Ian
