Re: gcc4.4.1 related doubt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



trisha yad <trisha1march@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I am attaching one sample program.
>
> 1. arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -O0 test.c
> 2. arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -O2 test.c
> arm-linux-gnueabi-nm of O0 is log1
> arm-linux-gnueabi-nm of O2 is log
>
>
> I am attaching o/p of command using option --save-temps i.e in file test.s
> arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc -fno-optimize-sibling-calls --save-temps -O2 test.c

I don't understand how the .c file you showed can produce the .s file
that you showed.  In the .c file, main calls ABC.  In the .s file, it
does not.  I don't see how the optimizer could remove that call.

I do see the T.12 symbol in the assembler source.  However, I don't
know where it came from.  I don't see when I compile your C file with
a recent ARM gcc.

Can you explain why the T.12 symbol is a problem?

Ian

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux