On 03/09/2010 04:30 PM, Thomas Martitz wrote: > EABI IIRC only mentions changed rules for passing 64bit types. This call > should have been the same with 4.4.3. It eventually is if the parameters > are in a different order. > > If this is really a gcc bug, how should we proceed? I assume a bug > report on bugzilla? This is very strange. Can you make a self-contained source file that shows the problem on its own? We need to be able to try it. It doesn't have to run, we just have to see the source it generates. Andrew.
