Re: -march options for Nehalem chipset ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: jimmie.davis@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: -march options for Nehalem chipset ?
From: jonathan.slark@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:54:52 +0000
Cc: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx, crunchy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Comments: In-reply-to jimmie.davis@xxxxxxxxxx message dated "Thu, 04 Feb 2010 09:40:51 -0600."
In-reply-to: <46835D054D115449BBE84934E2F2000904E01ACC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <46835D054D115449BBE84934E2F2000904E01ACC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Which -march option is a best match to the Intel Nehalem chips ?

-march=native

Jon

References:
- -march options for Nehalem chipset ?
  - From: jimmie . davis

Prev by Date: Re: Cast void * to u_int
Next by Date: Building 64-bit GCC
Previous by thread: -march options for Nehalem chipset ?
Next by thread: Cast void * to u_int
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux