On 12/18/09, fanqifei <fanqifei@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2009/12/18 Ineiev <ineiev@xxxxxxxxx>: >> On 12/18/09, fanqifei <fanqifei@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Otherwise, I have to write inline assembly code. >> >> Out of curiosity --- why do you think your executable has to use this >> pattern? > The instruction sequence generated by gcc can be simply rewritten by > three instructions. I see, thank you. > Apparently gcc should find the expression storing to bit-field and use > pattern insv. But it didn't. I'm sorry (really), as I know nothing about the target architecture, this is not apparent _for me_. What I don't understand is why you _has_ to code it in assembler? is your program essentially nothing but such assignments? or the code gcc provides assigns something wrong? I bag your pardon if this is too off-topic, Ineiev
