> Tyler Earman <rem.intellegare@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> Outside of the this-> operators, is there a better way of doing it? >> > > Not that I know of. > > >> I've >> been working with virtual inheritance, by applying virtual interfaces, >> but this is also generating a large amount of errors (code bellow). >> > > In your example, the reference to data in C::f appears to be > non-dependent, but it is actually dependent. You need to make clear to > the compiler that it is dependent. I think using this-> is the best > approach, and in fact I pretty much always use this-> even when it is > not required. In your example, you could also write Base<T>::data. > > Ian > Well at least using Base<T>::data seems a bit more intuitive than this-> (as far as readable code goes). Also it seems to be possible to use the "using Base<T>::data" declaration, which would be obvious I would guess. Thanks Ian, I guess that takes care of the issue as far as it can be solved. -Tyler
