Hi, Am I right in saying that defining a function like func_name (my_type_t * __restrict);is pointless, because there are no other pointers that the pointer could overlap with?
Can anyone explain what GCC does differently for the two following definitions:
func1 (my_type_t * __restrict, my_type_t *__restrict); AND func2 (my_type_t *, my_type_t *); ? Thanks, Marcus.