Re: need clarification of operator new and __m128

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthias Kretz <Matthias.Kretz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi,
>
> On Friday 14 August 2009 12:59:30 Matthias Kretz wrote:
>> Is this a bug in my code or in gcc? Do I have to add the alignment
>> restriction to the Vector class itself also?
>
> Thinking about this further I think this is not gcc's responsibility since 
> operator new (or malloc) are library functions and those know nothing of the 
> alignment restrictions of the underlying type, right?

Right.  It is unfortunate that glibc's malloc on x86 does not return the
alignment required by recent instructions.  This is
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206 , which see for the
reason that it does not work and for some things you can do about it.

Ian

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux