ami_stuff wrote: >> No, it isn't. > > Ok, so it is a GCC's bug? It's perhaps an optimization that gcc doesn't do. But then there is an infinite number of optimizations that gcc doesn't do. Andrew.
ami_stuff wrote: >> No, it isn't. > > Ok, so it is a GCC's bug? It's perhaps an optimization that gcc doesn't do. But then there is an infinite number of optimizations that gcc doesn't do. Andrew.
|