Re: missing g++ warning about bad allocation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Martin Ettl" <ettl.martin@xxxxxx> writes:

> compiling the following code with g++-4.4.0 on Ubuntu Linux (Jaunty):
>
>
> int main()
> {
> 	double * d = new double[-100];
> }
>
> compiles without warning. I used following compilation flags: (-W -Wall -Wextra -pedantic).
>
> Exectuting the compiled programm gives:
>
> ./test 
> terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc'
>   what():  std::bad_alloc
> Aborted
>
> Is there a reason why g++ does not warn about this? 

I doubt there is an explicit reason that there is no warning.  I expect
that nobody has ever been moved to add a warning for such an unusual
case.  gcc also does not warn about malloc(-100).

Ian

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux