kernel mailz <kernelmailz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> asm("sync");
Isn't gcc free to discard this as it has no dependencies, no indicated side
effects, and isn't required to be kept? I think this should probably be:
asm volatile("sync");
David
kernel mailz <kernelmailz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> asm("sync");
Isn't gcc free to discard this as it has no dependencies, no indicated side
effects, and isn't required to be kept? I think this should probably be:
asm volatile("sync");
David
|