charfi asma wrote: > > I am interested too in the GENERIC > tree > I compile hello.cpp using g++ > -fdump-tree-all, I do not get a generic intermediate representation, > there was (.tu, .class, .original, .gimple, .vcg ...) > To look at the GENERIC tree, I > compile hello.java using gcj (as mentioned in the answer bellow: "I > recommend looking at any gcc frontend other than the C/C++ frontends > to see how it is done....") > But when I compile java file using > the same option (fdump-tree-all) I do not get .generic as I expect.. > Before .gimple, gcj generate only .original That's right. gcj transforms its front-end trees straight into GIMPLE. I can't see any purpose to going via GENERIC. Andrew.
