Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Indeed not, no. "register volatile" makes no sense. > > I don't agree. "register volatile" makes perfect sense for the special > case of global or local register variables. Unfortunately they are not > implemented. Well, I just meant doesn't make any sense right now, given how gcc is implemented. For avoidance of doubt, I didn't mean that the concept makes no sense, although that's surely what I wrote. :-( Andrew.
