Re: Behavior of Instruction combination pass

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "venkat" <venkat@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Behavior of Instruction combination pass
From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 07:37:18 -0700
Cc: "'Georg-Johann Lay'" <avr@xxxxxxxx>, "'gnu'" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <BAA194F9645A425A88CF99AE3BEBA7B6@KVENKAT> (venkat@xxxxxxxxx's message of "Fri\, 5 Jun 2009 19\:32\:00 +0530")
References: <A2F4C7649BC3425AB807F9DC13D0A35A@KVENKAT> <4A290F6B.2080209@xxxxxxxx> <BAA194F9645A425A88CF99AE3BEBA7B6@KVENKAT>
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)

"venkat" <venkat@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I don't have much idea about RTX costs. Can you give me a brief idea on how
> to set RTX costs.

Use the TARGET_RTX_COSTS target hook.

Ian

References:
- Behavior of Instruction combination pass
  - From: venkat
- Re: Behavior of Instruction combination pass
  - From: Georg-Johann Lay
- RE: Behavior of Instruction combination pass
  - From: venkat

Prev by Date: RE: Behavior of Instruction combination pass
Next by Date: Re: Bloated Struct Problem
Previous by thread: RE: Behavior of Instruction combination pass
Next by thread: Atomic builtins always defined -- bug or feature?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux