On Tue, 26 May 2009 22:31:12 +0200 Luca Zorzo <lucazorzo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So why gentoo team suggest nocona for 64 bit and prescott for 32 bit? > (http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Safe_Cflags/Intel#Pentium_4_.28Prescott.29_.2F_Celeron_D) Just a note - we have nothing to do with the wiki, it's run by users. ;) I would guess that the reason it recommends nocona over prescott for 64 bit is that the GCC documentation says that nocona enables the same flags as prescott as well as "64-bit extensions". http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.3/gcc/i386-and-x86_002d64-Options.html -- gcc-porting, by design, by neglect treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
